Discussion about this post

User's avatar
jen's avatar

"....the general consensus is that if they can’t find an external cause of death, and the deceased happens to be higher-weight, the Medical Examiner or Coroner is likely to simply rule it as a “natural” death due to 'complications of ob*sity.'"

This is exactly why I think it is an absolute travesty that medical professionals are given god complexes and taught to never say "I don't know." No one knows everything. But when they pretend they do, people die. And even in death, these providers can't give patients the respect and decency of evidence-based care.

Rest in peace, Ms. Mallory and Ms. Hundley.

Expand full comment
MJ's avatar

This crap has infuriated me since I learned about it in the '90s. Fat person dies? It was the fat! Could there be another cause? NO! It's the fat!

I think the most egregious example of this BS is when people die on the operating table, especially from weight loss surgery that they've been talked into having. Are there higher risks for surgery for people who are very fat? Sometimes. But they're not risks that thinner people are exempt from. So when fat people die from WLS, it was especially common in the '90s and '00s to see statements like, "If only they'd had the surgery earlier! We could have saved their life!" Or, instead, they could have encouraged non-weight-oriented health changes which are more likely to work and *not frikkin' kill people*. Add to that more recent research that shows that the higher your body weight when you get WLS, the more likely you are to have serious complications, including death.

Argh. Sorry. It double infuriates me that the whole "died from ob*sity" is a favorite trope of extreme fatphobes. "My [relative/friend/dog walker's sister-in-law/whoever] died from ob*sity! I hate fat people because they'll die of it, too!" Uh-huh. (I looked up 'projection' in the dictionary and there was a picture of a fatphobe.)

Fat people may (or may not) have higher risks of various things, but that doesn't make weight the cause of anything. I seem to keep repeating this a lot recently: A risk factor is not a cause. And the number of "higher risks" are poorly constructed correlations. As Ragen says over and over and over again, it's rare for there to be considerations for socio-economic factors and weight cycling. The latter is especially aggravating as more and more research shows weight cycling is more damaging to health than being at even the highest weights and staying at that weight.

Expand full comment
21 more comments...

No posts